4.7 Article

Anionic polysaccharide stabilized nickel nanoparticles-coated bacterial cellulose as a highly efficient dip-catalyst for pollutants reduction

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104395

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Nickel nanoparticles; Pollutants; Carboxymethyl cellulose; Dip-catalyst

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [DF-034-130-1441]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the preparation and catalytic performance of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized nickel nanoparticles (CMC-Ni) and bacterial cellulose coated with it (CMC-Ni-BC) in the colloidal form and dip-catalyst, respectively. Ni nanoparticles were prepared by mixing nickel chloride and CMC aqueous solutions with reductant followed by quick microwave heating treatment. In a separate experiment, BC was synthesized by Gluconacetobacter xylinwn. After purification, the synthesized BC was coated with the prepared CMC-Ni. The CMC-Ni-BC catalytic efficiency was evaluated in anionic 2-nitrophenol (2-NP) and cationic methylene blue (MB) dye reduction reactions by sodium borohydride. While using the similar reaction conditions for the 2-NP reduction, the suspension form of CMC-Ni catalyst showed higher reduction reaction rate constant as compared to the dip-catalyst of CMC-Ni-BC. Similarly, high reaction rate constant was observed for the CMC-Ni in comparison with the CMC-Ni-BC while performing the MB reduction reaction. However, supported type Ni catalyst was easily applied in further reactions without the need of further processing which is needed in the case of colloidal form of the catalyst. Moreover, the CMC-Ni-BC catalyst was also tested in the complex situation using the binary solution of 2-NP and MB for their simultaneous reductions. As high as 7.89 min(-1) of reaction rate constant was calculated for the reduction of cationic MB by anionic polysaccharide stabilized Ni nanoparticles-coated BC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据