4.7 Article

Momentary predictors of compliance in studies using the experience sampling method

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112896

关键词

Momentary assessment; Compliance; Experience sampling; Diary; Ecological momentary assessment

资金

  1. Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse - Central Nervous System (RADAR-CNS) research program from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [115902]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
  3. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)
  4. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) Odysseus grant [GOF8416N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of momentary experiences on compliance has not yet been studied extensively in diary methods such as the experience sampling method (ESM). This study investigated to what extent momentary experiences at the moment of responding (hereafter `beep') can predict compliance in high frequency ESM protocols. Lagged-analyses were conducted using a pooled dataset of seven studies including 1,318 healthy volunteers and individuals with different mental health conditions. All studies used an ESM design of 10 beeps per day over 4 to 6 days. Overall compliance was 86% (to beeps where a subject was compliant at the previous beep). Results indicated that participants who reported higher positive affect overall were more compliant. Feeling disturbed by a beep, being outside the home, medication use, or longer inter-prompt interval decreased the chances of compliance to the subsequent beep. While participants with depression tended to be more compliant, chances to be compliant decreased in the evenings and over the course of the study days. When more beeps were missed consecutively, the chances to miss the subsequent beep increased. Findings suggest that disturbance of the beep, being outside the home, medication use, and inter-prompt interval might decrease the chances of compliance to the subsequent beep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据