4.8 Review

Recent advances in hybrid organic-inorganic materials with spatial architecture for state-of-the-art applications

期刊

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100663

关键词

Organic-inorganic material; Self-assembly; Electrochemistry; Catalysis; Energy; Biomedicine

资金

  1. Mid-Level Researcher National Project of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2C2004192]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130000202] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to their unique properties, hybrid organic-inorganic (HOI) materials with a variety of spatial architectures have emerged as potential candidates for state-of-the-art applications. This overview describes the formation mechanism of HOI materials, including chemical synthesis approaches, and their functional performance, which could be controlled using structural and compositional designs. We outline the current methods used to synthesize HOI materials via solution-based processes and chemical deposition. The scientific principles, including the reaction mechanisms of the organic and inorganic components and computational perspectives are included. The role of molecular self-assembly is also discussed. We highlight a couple of novel strategies for the construction of three-dimensional HOI materials where functional organic compounds are combined with metal ions and porous inorganic materials. The protective characteristics are summarized and their structural reliability either corrosive or flammable environments is higlighted. In addition, the most important applications for catalysis, energy storage devices, and biomedical purposes, which were attributed to the functional properties coferred by the architecture and composition of HOI materilas are reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据