4.5 Article

Steering eco-evolutionary game dynamics with manifold control

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0643

关键词

ecological public goods; cooperation; social dilemma; environmental feedback; switching control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11871004, 11922102]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1217336]
  3. NIH COBRE Program [1P20GM130454]
  4. Neukom CompX Faculty Grant
  5. Dartmouth Faculty Startup Fund
  6. Walter & Constance Burke Research Initiation Award
  7. Dartmouth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feedback loops between population dynamics of individuals and their ecological environment are ubiquitously found in nature and have shown profound effects on the resulting eco-evolutionary dynamics. By incorporating linear environmental feedback law into the replicator dynamics of two-player games, recent theoretical studies have shed light on understanding the oscillating dynamics of the social dilemma. However, the detailed effects of more general nonlinear feedback loops in multi-player games, which are more common especially in microbial systems, remain unclear. Here, we focus on ecological public goods games with environmental feedbacks driven by a nonlinear selection gradient. Unlike previous models, multiple segments of stable and unstable equilibrium manifolds can emerge from the population dynamical systems. We find that a larger relative asymmetrical feedback speed for group interactions centred on cooperators not only accelerates the convergence of stable manifolds but also increases the attraction basin of these stable manifolds. Furthermore, our work offers an innovative manifold control approach: by designing appropriate switching control laws, we are able to steer the eco-evolutionary dynamics to any desired population state. Our mathematical framework is an important generalization and complement to coevolutionary game dynamics, and also fills the theoretical gap in guiding the widespread problem of population state control in microbial experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据