4.8 Article

Intraflagellar transport protein RABL5/IFT22 recruits the BBSome to the basal body through the GTPase ARL6/BBS3

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901665117

关键词

IFT22; BBS3; BBSome; basal body; cilia

资金

  1. International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Grant [CRP/CHN15-01]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Grant [19PTSYJC00050]
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM110413]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41876134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a ciliopathy caused by defects in the assembly or distribution of the BBSome, a conserved protein complex. The BBSome cycles via intraflagellar transport (IFT) through cilia to transport signaling proteins. How the BBSome is recruited to the basal body for binding to IFT trains for ciliary entry remains unknown. Here, we show that the Rab-like 5 GTPase IFT22 regulates basal body targeting of the BBSome in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Our functional, biochemical and single particle in vivo imaging assays show that IFT22 is an active GTPase with low intrinsic GTPase activity. IFT22 is part of the IFT-B1 subcomplex but is not required for ciliary assembly. Independent of its association to IFT-B1, IFT22 binds and stabilizes the Arf-like 6 GTPase BBS3, a BBS protein that is not part of the BBSome. IFT22/BBS3 associates with the BBSome through an interaction between BBS3 and the BBSome. When both IFT22 and BBS3 are in their guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound states they recruit the BBSome to the basal body for coupling with the IFT-B1 subcomplex. The GTP-bound BBS3 likely remains to be associated with the BBSome upon ciliary entry. In contrast, IFT22 is not required for the transport of BBSomes in cilia, indicating that the BBSome is transferred from IFT22 to the IFT trains at the ciliary base. In summary, our data propose that nucleotide-dependent recruitment of the BBSome to the basal body by IFT22 regulates BBSome entry into cilia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据