4.8 Article

BSA as additive: A simple strategy for practical applications of PNA in bioanalysis

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 167-173

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.02.030

关键词

Bioanalysis; Bovine serum albumin; Graphene oxide; Peptide nucleic acid; Signal enhancement

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program [2011-0017356, 2011-0020322]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program [2014K1B1A1073716]
  3. Research Center Program (IBS-R) of IBS (Institute for Basic Science) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Research Program through the SMBA - Korean government (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) [C0193918]
  5. Korea Technology & Information Promotion Agency for SMEs (TIPA) [C0193918] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Application of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) in bioanalysis has been limited due to its nonspecific adsorption onto hydrophobic surface in spite of favorable properties such as higher chemical/biological stability, specificity and binding affinity towards target nucleic acids compared to natural nucleic acid probes. Herein, we employed BSA in PNA application to enhance the stability of PNA in hydrophobic containers and improve the sensing performance of the DNA sensor based on graphene oxide (GO) and PNA. Addition of 0.01% BSA in a PNA solution effectively prevented the adsorption of PNA on hydrophobic surface and increased the portion of the effective PNA strands for target binding without interfering duplex formation with a complementary target sequence. In the GO based biosensor using PNA, BSA interrupted the unfavorable adsorption of PNA/DNA duplex on GO surface, while allowing the adsorption of ssPNA, resulting in improvement of the performance of the DNA sensor system by reducing the detection limit by 90-folds. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据