4.8 Article

Lifetimes of interstellar dust from cosmic ray exposure ages of presolar silicon carbide

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904573117

关键词

interstellar dust; presolar grains; exposure age dating; cosmochemistry; meteorites

资金

  1. NASA [NNX11AG77G, NNX15AC53G, 80NSSC19K0504, NNX15AF78G, 80NSSC17K0251]
  2. Tawani Foundation
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowships [DGE-1144082, DGE-1746045]
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [200081/2005-5]
  5. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  6. LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program [19-FS-028]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation
  8. NASA [NNX11AG77G, 145931, 808247, NNX15AC53G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined interstellar cosmic ray exposure ages of 40 large presolar silicon carbide grains extracted from the Murchison CM2 meteorite. Our ages, based on cosmogenic Ne-21, range from 3.9 +/- 1.6 Ma to similar to 3 +/- 2 Ga before the start of the Solar System similar to 4.6 Ga ago. A majority of the grains have interstellar lifetimes of <300 Ma, which is shorter than theoretical estimates for large grains. These grains condensed in outflows of asymptotic giant branch stars <4.9 Ga ago that possibly formed during an episode of enhanced star formation similar to 7 Ga ago. A minority of the grains have ages >1 Ga. Longer lifetimes are expected for large grains. We determined that at least 12 of the analyzed grains were parts of aggregates in the interstellar medium: The large difference in nuclear recoil loss of cosmic ray spallation products He-3 and Ne-21 enabled us to estimate that the irradiated objects in the interstellar medium were up to 30 times larger than the analyzed grains. Furthermore, we estimate that the majority of the grains acquired the bulk of their cosmogenic nuclides in the interstellar medium and not by exposure to an enhanced particle flux of the early active sun.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据