4.8 Article

Sixteen years of social and ecological dynamics reveal challenges and opportunities for adaptive management in sustaining the commons

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914812116

关键词

social-ecological system; adaptive management; coral reef; customary management; fisheries

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [CE140100020, FT160100047, DP110101540, DP0877905, DE190101583]
  2. Pew Charitable Trust
  3. Paul M. Angell Family Foundation
  4. CGIAR Trust Fund
  5. National Geographic
  6. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  7. Royal Society University Research Fellowship [UF140691]
  8. Australian Research Council [DE190101583, DP0877905] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efforts to confront the challenges of environmental change and uncertainty include attempts to adaptively manage social-ecological systems. However, critical questions remain about whether adaptive management can lead to sustainable outcomes for both ecosystems and society. Here, we make a contribution to these efforts by presenting a 16-y analysis of ecological outcomes and perceived livelihood impacts from adaptive coral reef management in Papua New Guinea. The adaptive management system we studied was a customary rotational fisheries closure system (akin to fallow agriculture), which helped to increase the biomass of reef fish and make fish less wary (more catchable) relative to openly fished areas. However, over time the amount of fish in openly fished reefs slowly declined. We found that, overall, resource users tended to have positive perceptions about this system, but there were negative perceptions when fishing was being prohibited. We also highlight some of the key traits of this adaptive management system, including 1) strong social cohesion, whereby leaders played a critical role in knowledge exchange; 2) high levels of compliance, which was facilitated via a carrot-and-stick approach that publicly rewarded good behavior and punished deviant behavior; and 3) high levels of participation by community actors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据