4.2 Article

Quinoline yellow (food additive) induced conformational changes in lysozyme: a spectroscopic, docking and simulation studies of dye-protein interactions

期刊

PREPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 7, 页码 673-681

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2020.1725774

关键词

Circular dichroism; fluorescence; lysozyme; protein aggregation; quinoline yellow

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quinoline yellow (QY) is a synthetic yellow dye widely used as a coloring agent for various foodstuffs. In the current study, we have examined the role of QY on the aggregation propensity of hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL) under physiological conditions. The dye induced conformational changes in HEWL leading to aggregate formation were identified by circular dichroism (CD), turbidity analysis, fluorescence measurement and microscopic (TEM) imaging. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies were also employed to strengthen binding and aggregation results. Our results indicate that 25-100 mu M of QY induces aggregation in HEWL, while lower QY concentrations (5 and 10 mu M) does not have any effect on the aggregation propensity of HEWL. The kinetics of HEWL aggregation demonstrate nucleation independent aggregation of HEWL without lag phase. On the other hand, far UV-CD analysis illustrated the loss of alpha-helical structure with the increasing concentration of QY. TEM results also support the formation of aggregate structures in HEWL when exposed to QY. Molecular docking and simulation studies revealed that the HEWL-QY complex is stable as compared to individual entities. In silico analysis also illustrated that QY-induced aggregation of HEWL proceeds through the formation of hydrogen bonds, electrostatic (Pi-Anion) and Pi-Sulfur interactions. The above-mentioned results highlight the possible detrimental effect by food additive dyes, particularly in protein misfolding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据