4.7 Article

Synthesis of a novel liquid phosphorus-containing flame retardant for flexible polyurethane foam: Combustion behaviors and thermal properties

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.109029

关键词

Phosphorus-containing flame retardant; Halogen-free; Flexible polyurethane foam; Dimethyl methylphosphonate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51761135113, U1833133, 51874266]
  2. Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province [KJ2018A0593]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To overcome the shortcomings of limited flame retardant efficiency and migration of commercialized dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) in flexible polyurethane foams (FPUFs), a novel liquid phosphorus-containing flame retardant named bis((dimethoxyphosphoryl)methyl) phenyl phosphate (BDMPP) was synthesized via dimethyl (hydroxymethyl)phosphonate and phenyl dichlorophosphate and applied into FPUFs. Compared with DMMP, BDMPP contains two kinds of phosphorus with higher molecular weight and one kind of its phosphorus is very similar with that of DMMP. The flame retardancy of FPUFs was evaluated by limiting oxygen index (LOI), vertical burning test and cone calorimetry test. In contrast with DMMP, BDMPP showed better flame retardancy. When 20 wt% BDMPP (relative to polyether polyol) was incorporated, the foam composite obtained an LOI value of 23.0% and passed the vertical burning test. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) demonstrated that BDMPP containing FPUFs had better thermal stability and more char yield than those of DMMP containing FPUFs. Moreover, accelerated heat ageing test revealed that BDMPP exhibited better resistance to migration than DMMP. The flame retardant mechanisms were investigated by FTIR, thermogravimetric analysis/infrared spectrometry (TG-IR), scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Compared with DMMP, the increase in the flame retardancy of BDMMP in FPUFs is possibly due to its different structure. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据