4.7 Article

Development of cashew nut shell carbon reinforced thiourea based biophenolic benzoxazine-epoxy composites: High performance biobased coating materials

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 1950-1961

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.25510

关键词

biobased polymer composites; cashew nut shell carbon; corrosion resistant coating; hydrophobic behavior; thiourea-based bio-benzoxazine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research work focused on the preparation of biobased eugenol benzoxazine (EUBz) using thiourea as amine resource and their conversion into EUBz-epoxy (EUBz-EP) blend matrix and EUBz-EP blend composites. In the present work, thiourea-based eugenol-benzoxazine monomer was synthesized using eugenol as phenolic compound, thiourea as amine resource and paraformaldehyde. The molecular structure of monomer was confirmed by FTIR, NMR, and Maldi mass studies. The thiourea-based EUBz properties were enhanced by the blending of EP resin and reinforced with varying weight percentages of amine functionalized cashew nut shell carbon (f-CSC). The thermally cured f-CSC/EUBz-EP composites possesses a higher glass transition temperature of 202.9 degrees C when compared to that of the EUBz matrix (104.2 degrees C), which might arise due to the higher crosslinking density resulted from the reinforcement of EP resin with f-CSC. In addition, the hydrophobic behavior of the prepared composite materials is improved by blending the EUBz with EP resin and reinforcing with f-CSC. The enhancement of the value of contact angle from 80.3 degrees to 105.9 degrees infers the improvement of hydrophobic behavior of f-CSC reinforced EUBz-EP blend composites. The corrosion rate and protection efficiency of 5 wt% f-CSC/EUBz-EP composites exhibits 0.814 (mm/year) and 99.97%, respectively. Data obtained from different studies suggested that the f-CSC reinforced EUBz-EP blended composites can be used in the form of sealants, encapsulants, adhesives, and coatings for different industrial and engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据