4.3 Article

An Expedient Four Component Synthesis of Substituted Pyrido-Pyrimidine Heterocycles in Glycerol:Proline Based Low Transition Temperature Mixture and Their Antioxidant Activity with Molecular Docking Studies

期刊

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 137-155

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2020.1720749

关键词

Green chemistry; green metrics; low transition temperature mixture; multicomponent reactions; pyrido-pyrimidines

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology New Delhi [JRF-IF150988]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an efficient and environmentally friendly four component synthesis method for the production of structurally diverse substituted pyrido-pyrimidines. The method utilizes a low transition temperature mixture (LTTM) as a green solvent, which serves as a reusable catalyst and solvent. The protocol offers advantages such as easy work up, shorter reaction time, higher yield, and excellent green chemistry metrics.
The present work describes an efficient and environmentally benign four component synthesis of structurally diverse substituted pyrido-pyrimidines involving the reaction of barbituric acid, 4-hydroxy 6-methyl 2-pyrone, an aromatic aldehyde and ammonium acetate in low transition temperature mixture (LTTM) (glycerol:proline: 1:1). The LTTM serves as green solvent which is an inexpensive, nontoxic and plays a dual function (reusable catalyst and solvent), and is found to be an excellent reaction endorsing medium. The present protocol offers some advantages such as easy work up, shorter reaction time, an excellent yield with higher atom economy, maximum reaction efficiency with an excellent green chemistry metrics. The synthesized compounds have been evaluated for their antioxidant activity using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay as well as molecular docking studies performed on myeloperoxidase enzyme. Tested scaffolds exhibits an excellent results of virtual screening and antioxidant activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据