4.6 Article

Adaptation mechanism of the adult zebrafish respiratory organ to endurance training

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228333

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Foundation [31003A_176038]
  2. Swiss Cancer Research [KFS-4281-08-2017]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_176038] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study the adaptation scope of the fish respiratory organ and the O-2 metabolism due to endurance training, we subjected adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) to endurance exercise for 5 weeks. After the training period, the swimmer group showed a significant increase in swimming performance, body weight and length. In scanning electron microscopy of the gills, the average length of centrally located primary filaments appeared significantly longer in the swimmer than in the non-trained control group (+6.1%, 1639 mu m vs. 1545 mu m, p = 0.00043) and the average number of secondary filaments increased significantly (+7.7%, 49.27 vs. 45.73, p = 9e-09). Micro-computed tomography indicated a significant increase in the gill volume (p = 0.048) by 11.8% from 0.490 mm(3) to 0.549 mm(3). The space-filling complexity dropped significantly (p = 0.0088) by 8.2% from 38.8% to 35.9%., i.e. making the gills of the swimmers less compact. Respirometry after 5 weeks showed a significantly higher oxygen consumption (+30.4%, p = 0.0081) of trained fish during exercise compared to controls. Scanning electron microscopy revealed different stages of new secondary filament budding, which happened at the tip of the primary lamellae. Using BrdU we could confirm that the growth of the secondary filaments took place mainly in the distal half and the tip and for primary filaments mainly at the tip. We conclude that the zebrafish respiratory organ-unlike the mammalian lung-has a high plasticity, and after endurance training increases its volume and changes its structure in order to facilitate O-2 uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据