4.6 Article

Beyond the heterodimer model for mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor interactions in nuclei and at DNA

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227520

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L007622/1]
  2. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute
  3. Center for Cancer Research (USA)
  4. Neuroendocrinology Charitable Trust [12/13-5751, 13/14-5810]
  5. Society for Endocrinology Early Career Grant
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council International Scientific Interchange Scheme
  7. British Society for Neuroendocrinology Project Support Grant
  8. BBSRC Alert 13 capital grant [BB/L014181/1]
  9. BBSRC [BB/L007622/1, BB/L014181/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MR/R010919/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZICBC011574] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) are believed to classically bind DNA as homodimers or MR-GR heterodimers to influence gene regulation in response to pulsatile basal or stress-evoked glucocorticoid secretion. Pulsed corticosterone presentation reveals MR and GR co-occupy DNA only at the peaks of glucocorticoid oscillations, allowing interaction. GR DNA occupancy was pulsatile, while MR DNA occupancy was prolonged through the inter-pulse interval. In mouse mammary 3617 cells MR-GR interacted in the nucleus and at a chromatin-associated DNA binding site. Interactions occurred irrespective of ligand type and receptors formed complexes of higher order than heterodimers. We also detected MR-GR interactions ex-vivo in rat hippocampus. An expanded range of MR-GR interactions predicts structural allostery allowing a variety of transcriptional outcomes and is applicable to the multiple tissue types that co-express both receptors in the same cells whether activated by the same or different hormones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据