4.8 Article

The microfluidic chip module for the detection of murine norovirus in oysters using charge switchable micro-bead beating

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 625-633

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.083

关键词

Charge switchable microbead; Shape switchable microchannel; Norovirus; Oyster; Bead-beating; NASBA

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korea government (MEST) [NRF-2013R1A2A2A03015620]
  2. BioNano Health-Guard Research Center - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea as Global Frontier Project [HGUARD_2013M3A6B2078950]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sample preparation has recently been an issue in the detection of food poisoning pathogens, particularly viruses such as norovirus (NoV), in food because of the complexity of foods and raw fresh materials. Here, we demonstrate a total analytical microfluidic chip module to automatically perform a series of essential processes (cell concentration, lysis (RNA extraction), nucleic acid amplification, and detection) for the fast but sensitive detection of norovirus in oysters. The murine NoV spiked oyster was stomached using a standard method. The supernatant was first loaded into a shape switchable sample preparation chamber consisting of charge switchable micro-beads. Murine NoV, which was adsorbed on microbeads by electrostatic physisorption, was lysed using bead beating. The extracted RNA was transferred to the detection chamber to be amplified using Nucleic Acid Sequence Based Amplification (NASBA). The optimal surface functionality, size, and number of microbeads were achieved for the virus concentration and the stable RNA extraction in the shape-switchable micro-channel. As a result, murine NoV in a single oyster was successfully detected within 4 h by the microfluidic chip developed here, and could be directly applied to the large volume environmental sample as well as the food sample. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据