4.8 Article

A plasmon-assisted fluoro-immunoassay using gold nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanotubes for monitoring the influenza virus

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 311-317

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.021

关键词

Plasmon-assisted fluoro-immunoassay; Gold nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanotube; CdTe quantum dot; Influenza virus detection platform; Plasmonic resonance energy transfer

资金

  1. Promotion of Nanobio-technology Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C0862]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2013004637]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25246029] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plasmon-assisted fluoro-immunoassay (PAFI) was developed for the detection of the influenza virus by using Au nanoparticle (Au NP)-decorated carbon nanotubes (AuCNTs) that were synthesized using phytochemical composites at room temperature in deionized water. Specific antibodies (Abs) against the influenza virus were conjugated onto the surface of AuCNTs and cadmium telluride quantum dots (QDs), which had a photoluminescence intensity that varied as a function of virus concentration and a detection limit of 0.1 pg/mL for all three types of influenza viruses examined. The clinically isolated influenza viruses (A/Yokohama/110/2009 (H3N2)) were detected in the range of 50-10,000 PFU/mL, with a detection limit of 50 PFU/mL. From a series of proof-of-concept and clinical experiments, the developed PAFI biosensing system provided robust signal production and enhancement, as well as an excellent selectivity and sensitivity for influenza viruses. This nanoparticle-based technique could be potentially developed as an efficient detection platform for the influenza virus. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据