4.7 Article

Metacaspase MC1 enhances aluminum-induced programmed cell death of root tip cells in Peanut

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 448, 期 1-2, 页码 479-494

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04448-w

关键词

Metacaspase; AhMC1; Aluminum toxicity; PCD; Peanut root tips

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31776190, 31560346, 31660350, 31701356, 31860334]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China [2016GXNSFBA380223]
  3. Training Program for 1000 Young and Middle-aged Backbone Teachers of Guangxi Higher Education Institution in 2019

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Metacaspases are cysteine-dependent proteases, which play essential roles in programmed cell death (PCD), and caspase-3-like protease is the crucial executioner. However, its response mechanism to aluminum (Al)-induced PCD is still elusive. Methods Here, the type I metacaspase gene in peanut (Arachis hypoganea L.), AhMC1, was cloned from the Al-sensitive cultivar ZH2. Physiological and biochemical methods, as well as gene expression analyses, were employed to explore its function in Al-induced PCD in peanut root tips. Results AhMC1 had a 1068-bp open reading frame, encoding a peptide of 355 amino acids, and the purified protein exhibited a high caspase-3-like protease activity. Its expression levels in different tissues of peanut varieties ZH2 and 99-1507 (Al-tolerant) varied under Al-stress conditions. The subcellular localization indicated that AhMC1 was transferred from mitochondria into the cytoplasm. Furthermore, overexpressing AhMC1 reduced the resistance to Al stress. Sense transgenic plants showed a low relative root growth rate, and reduced superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase activities, compared with wild-type and antisense transgenic plants under Al-stress conditions, but had a high root-cell death rate, and increased Al and maleic dialdehyde contents. Conclusions The data suggest that metacaspase AhMC1 is a positive factor in Al-induced PCD in peanut root tips.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据