4.7 Review

A perspective on conventional high-temperature superconductors at high pressure: Methods and materials

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.003

关键词

High-pressure chemistry; Hydrides; Conventional superconductivity; Density-functional theory; Structure prediction

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Supercomputing Center (CSCS) in Lugano [s970]
  3. Fondo Ateneo Sapienza 2017-18
  4. Italian Ministry for Research and Education through PRIN-2017 project Tuning and understanding Quantum phases in 2D materials -Quantum 2D (IT-MIUR) [2017Z8TS5B]
  5. CINECA (ISCRA initiative)
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [16H06345, 19H05825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two hydrogen-rich materials, H3S and LaH10, synthesized at megabar pressures, have revolutionized the field of condensed matter physics providing the first glimpse to the solution of the hundred-year-old problem of room temperature superconductivity. The mechanism underlying superconductivity in these exceptional compounds is the conventional electron-phonon coupling. Here we describe recent advances in experimental techniques, superconductivity theory and first-principles computational methods which have made possible these discoveries. This work aims to provide an up-to-date compendium of the available results on superconducting hydrides and explain how the synergy of different methodologies led to extraordinary discoveries in the field. Besides, in an attempt to evidence empirical rules governing superconductivity in binary hydrides under pressure, we discuss general trends in the electronic structure and chemical bonding. The last part of the Review introduces possible strategies to optimize pressure and transition temperatures in conventional superconducting materials as well as future directions in theoretical, computational and experimental research. (C) 2020 The Author( s ). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据