4.7 Article

Contrasting properties of particle-particle and hole-hole excitations in 206Tl and 210Bi nuclei

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 802, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135222

关键词

Nuclear structure Tl-206, Bi-210; gamma gamma-coin. Tl-206; Branching ratios Tl-206; Deduced levels and J(pi) Tl-206; Comparison with shell-model calculations

资金

  1. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  2. Polish National Science Centre [2014/14/M/ST2/00738, 2013/08/M/ST2/00257]
  3. German BMBF [05P19RDFN1]
  4. DFG [SFB 1245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A complete-spectroscopy investigation of low-lying, low-spin states in the one-proton-hole and one neutron-hole nucleus Tl-206 has been performed by using thermal neutron capture and gamma-coincidence technique with the FIPPS Ge array at ILL Grenoble. The new experimental results, together with data for the one-proton-particle and one-neutron-particle nucleus Bi-210 (taken from a previous study done at ILL in the EXILL campaign), allowed for an extensive comparison with predictions of shell-model calculations performed with realistic interactions. No phenomenological adjustments were introduced in the calculations. In Bi-210, state energies, transition multipolarities and decay branchings agree well with theory for the three well separated multiplets of states which dominate the low-lying excitations. On the contrary, in Tl-206 significant discrepancies are observed: in the same energy region, six multiplets were identified, with a significant mixing among them being predicted, as a consequence of the smaller energy separation between the active orbitals. The discrepancies in Tl-206 are attributed to the larger uncertainties in the determination of the off-diagonal matrix elements of the realistic shell-model interaction with respect to the calculated diagonal matrix elements, the only ones playing a major role in the case of Bi-210. The work points to the need of more advanced approaches in the construction of the realistic interactions. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据