4.8 Article

Lanthanide based dual-emission fluorescent probe for detection of mercury (II) in milk

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 566-571

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.015

关键词

Lanthanide; Dual-emission; Fluorescent probe; Mercury (II); Milk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305054, 21165010]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangxi Normal University
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20133604120002]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Education Commission of Jiangxi Province [GJJ14258]
  5. Young Scientist Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20112BCB23006, 20122BCB23011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is highly desirable to develop a simple and sensitive method for Hg2+ detection because of the dangerous nature of Hg2+. In this work, we prepared a dual-emission fluorescent probe for Hg2+ detection by combining two lanthanide chelates with different emission wavelengths. Green-emitting terbium (Tb3+) chelates as reference signals were embedded into SiO2 nanoparticles and red-emitting europium (Eu3+) chelates as response units were covalently linked to the surface of silica shell. Upon the addition of Hg2+, the fluorescence of Eu3+ chelates can be selectively quenched, while the fluorescence of Tb3+ chelates remained unchanged. As a kind of Hg2+ nanosensor, the dual-emission fluorescent probe exhibited excellent selectivity to Hg2+ and high sensitivity up to 7.07 nM detection limit. The Hg2+ levels in drinking water and milk samples were determined by using the dual-emission fluorescent probe with satisfied recovery. Additionally, our probe has a long enough fluorescence lifetime, which can avoid the interference from autofluorescence of the biological samples. We envision that the proposed probe could find great potential applications for ultrasensitive time-resolved fluorometric assays and biomedical imaging in the future. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据