4.6 Article

Applying artificial neural network and curve fitting method to predict the viscosity of SAE50/MWCNTs-TiO2 hybrid nanolubricant

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123946

关键词

Artificial neural networks; Hybrid nanolubricant; Rheological behavior; Curve-fitting; New correlations

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51465047]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China [20151BAB207011]
  3. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2014ZD56009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two sets of laboratory data were used to foresee the rheological behavior of the hybrid nanolubricant of SAE50/MWCNTs-TiO2. For this purpose, at the first, power-law and consistency indices were attained by curve-fitting on shear stress-shear rate diagrams. Then, some correlations were proposed to estimate the viscosity, consistency-index and power-law-index as a function of temperature, solid volume fraction and shear rate. After that, an optimal artificial neural network (ANN) was proposed to predict the viscosity and another ANN was designed to predict the consistency-index and power-law-index. One hundred and forty-five viscosity values were used for forecasting viscosity (ANN-1). Since the rheological behavior of the nanolubricant was estimated by the power-law model, the indices were predicted using ANN-2. In this way, thirty experimental data for each index also were considered to supply ANN-2. For both ANNs, the data categories were separated to training and test data sets, which consisted of 80% and 20%, respectively. Results showed that for an exact prediction of power-law-index, it is compulsory to suggest 6 equations that each correspond to a temperature. This problem was solved by providing a neural network for simultaneous prediction of consistency and power-law indices. Comparisons between the proposed correlations and ANNs indicated that ANNs were more useful than correlations. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据