4.6 Article

An atlas of transposable element-derived alternative splicing in cancer

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0342

关键词

transposable elements; alternative splicing; cancer; tumorigenesis; gene expression; gene regulation

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM105490]
  2. IHRC-Georgia Tech Applied Bioinformatics Laboratory (ABiL)
  3. Georgia Tech Bioinformatics Graduate Program
  4. Ovarian Cancer Institute (Atlanta)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transposable element (TE)-derived sequences comprise more than half of the human genome, and their presence has been documented to alter gene expression in a number of different ways, including the generation of alternatively spliced transcript isoforms. Alternative splicing has been associated with tumorigenesis for a number of different cancers. The objective of this study was to broadly characterize the role of human TEs in generating alternatively spliced transcript isoforms in cancer. To do so, we screened for the presence of TE-derived sequences co-located with alternative splice sites that are differentially used in normal versus cancer tissues. We analysed a comprehensive set of alternative splice variants characterized for 614 matched normal-tumour tissue pairs across 13 cancer types, resulting in the discovery of 4820 TE-generated alternative splice events distributed among 723 cancer-associated genes. Short interspersed nuclear elements (Alu) and long interspersed nuclear elements (L1) were found to contribute the majority of TE-generated alternative splice sites in cancer genes. A number of cancer-associated genes, including MYH11, WHSC1 and CANT1, were shown to have overexpressed TE-derived isoforms across a range of cancer types. TE-derived isoforms were also linked to cancer-specific fusion transcripts, suggesting a novel mechanism for the generation of transcriptome diversity via trans-splicing mediated by dispersed TE repeats. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Crossroads between transposons and gene regulation'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据