4.4 Article

PLA-PCL-PEG-PCL-PLA based micelles for improving the ocular permeability of dexamethasone: development, characterization, and in vitro evaluation

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 704-719

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2020.1733606

关键词

Dexamethasone; ocular permeability; micelles; pentablock copolymer; cellular uptake

资金

  1. Research Council of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  2. Student Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present research was to investigate the feasibility of developing polylactide-polycaprolactone-polyethylene glycol-polycaprolactone-polylactide (PLA-PCL-PEG-PCL-PLA) based micelles to improve ocular permeability of dexamethasone (DEX). PLA-PCL-PEG-PCL-PLA copolymers were synthesized by a ring-opening polymerization method. DEX was loaded into the developed copolymers. The DEX-loaded micelles were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods. Cytotoxicity of the micelles obtained was investigated on L929 cell line. Cellular uptake was followed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses. The release behavior of DEX from the micelles as well as the drug release kinetics was studied. Corneal permeability was also evaluated using an ex vivo bovine model. The pentablock copolymers were successfully synthesized. The TEM results verified the formation of spherical micelles, the sizes of which was approximately 65 nm. The micelles exhibited suitable compatibility on L929 cells. The release profile showed an initial burst release phase followed by a sustained release phase, the kinetic of which was close to the Weibull's distribution model. The micelles showed higher corneal permeability in comparison to a marketed DEX eye drop. Taken together, the results indicated that the PLA-PCL-PEG-PCL-PLA micelles could be appropriate candidates for the ocular delivery of DEX, and probably other hydrophobic drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据