4.4 Article

Clinical relevance of membrane attack complex deposition in children with IgA nephropathy and Henoch-Schonlein purpura

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 843-850

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-019-04445-x

关键词

Membrane attack complex; IgA nephropathy; Henoch-Schonlein purpura; Pediatric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and Henoch-Schonlein purpura are common glomerular disorders in children sharing the same histopathologic pattern of IgA deposits within the mesangium, even if their physiopathology may be different. Repeated exposure to pathogens induces the production of abnormal IgA1. The immune complex deposition in the renal mesangium in IgAN or potentially in small vessels in Henoch-Schonlein purpura induces complement activation via the alternative and lectin pathways. Recent studies suggest that levels of membrane attack complex (MAC) in the urine might be a useful indicator of renal injury. Because of the emerging availability of therapies that selectively block complement activation, the aim of the present study is to investigate whether MAC immunostaining might be a useful marker of IgA-mediated renal injury. Methods We conducted immunohistochemistry analysis of the MAC on renal biopsies from 67 pediatric patients with IgAN and Henoch-Schonlein purpura. We classified their renal biopsies according to the Oxford classification, retrieved symptoms, biological parameters, treatment, and follow-up. Results We found MAC expression was significantly related to impaired renal function and patients whose clinical course required therapy. MAC deposits tend to be more abundant in patients with decreased glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.02), patients with proteinuria > 0.750 g/day/1.73 m(2), and with nephrotic syndrome. No correlation with histological alterations was observed. Conclusions We conclude that MAC deposition could be a useful additional indicator of renal injury in patients with IgAN and Henoch-Schonlein purpura, independent of other indicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据