4.5 Article

Multidisciplinary education improves school personnel's self-efficacy in managing food allergy and anaphylaxis

期刊

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 380-387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pai.13212

关键词

anaphylaxis; children; education; food allergy; management; school; self-efficacy; training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite a relatively high risk for allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, schools are not sufficiently trained and confident in handling children suffering from food allergy. This study aimed to measure the improvement of school personnel's self-efficacy in managing food allergy and anaphylaxis at school after a specific multidisciplinary training course. Methods: A total of 592 teachers and school caretakers completed the School Personnel Self-Efficacy-Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Questionnaire (S.PER.SE-FAAQ) before and after the course. The median difference, along with I quartile and III quartile, in scores between baseline and post-intervention assessment was calculated. A conditional regression tree was fitted for each outcome measured after the educational intervention. Results: At baseline, school personnel reported low self-efficacy in anaphylaxis management (AM), especially in recognizing anaphylaxis symptoms and administering proper drugs. After the specific multidisciplinary training course, all scores improved. AM scores particularly showed a significant increase. School personnel's post-training self-efficacy was found to be related to initial levels. Some indicative threshold values emerged. Remarkably, participants with a low self-efficacy at baseline seemed to particularly benefit from the training. Conclusions: Results highlighted the effectiveness of specific multidisciplinary training courses in improving teachers' and school caretakers' self-efficacy in managing food allergy and anaphylaxis. The S.PER.SE-FAAQ is confirmed to be an easy and helpful tool to assess the level of food allergy and anaphylaxis management in the school staff and training effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据