4.5 Review

How can we describe impact of adult patient participation in health -service development? A scoping review

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 103, 期 8, 页码 1453-1466

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.028

关键词

Patient participation; User involvement; Co-production; Patient advocacy; Health care reform; Quality improvement; Health services; Primary health care; Mental health services; Hospitals; Review

资金

  1. Stiftelsen Dam, Norway
  2. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health at Oslo University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Patient participation represents a worldwide policy, but its impact lacks research. This study investigates impact of patient participation in health -service development by providing a comprehensive overview of how the literature describes it. Method: A scoping review with a broad search strategy was conducted. The literature was examined for study characteristics, purpose for, approaches to and impact of patient participation. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Results: The 34 included primary studies reported impacts of patient participation that were interpreted to constitute two categories: 1. The participatory process'impact on involved patient representatives and health professionals, and the organizations patient participation practice itself. 2. The participatory service development?s impact on the design and delivery of services regarding patients and health professionals, and the organization. Conclusion: The literature describes a broad variation of impacts from health -service development, relevant for health professionals and patient representatives when initiating or participating in such processes. Our review provides an overview and discussion of these types of impact. Practice implications: The findings can be of practical relevance to those aiming to develop services, quality indicators regarding effects of patient participation, or to further investigate aspects of participatory service development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据