4.3 Article

Liposomal Irinotecan+5-FU/LV in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Subgroup Analyses of Patient, Tumor, and Previous Treatment Characteristics in the Pivotal NAPOLI-1 Trial

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 62-75

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001455

关键词

irinotecan liposomal injection; mPAC; pancreatic cancer; phase 3 clinical trial; subanalysis; post hoc

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Pfizer
  3. Merck Serono
  4. Polaris
  5. TTY
  6. SyncoreBio
  7. Celgene
  8. 4SC
  9. Bristol Myers-Squibb
  10. Roche
  11. Amgen
  12. AstraZeneca
  13. Bayer
  14. Merrimack
  15. Medimmune
  16. Sanofi
  17. Newlink Genetics
  18. Precision Therapeutics
  19. Aduro Biotech
  20. EMD Serono
  21. Halozyme
  22. Oncomed
  23. CTI
  24. Lilly
  25. Abbvie
  26. Plexxikon
  27. Verastem
  28. Merck
  29. BioMedVally Discoveries
  30. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA
  31. Shire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The NAnoliPOsomaL Irinotecan (NAPOLI-1) study (NCT01494506) was the largest global phase 3 study in a post-gemcitabine metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) population (N = 417). The subanalyses reported here investigated the prognostic effect of tumor characteristics and disease stage, prior treatment characteristics, baseline patient characteristics on survival outcomes in NAPOLI-1, and whether liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) benefited patients with mPAC across subgroups. Methods Post hoc analyses were performed in the NAPOLI-1 population (4 across tumor characteristics and disease stage, 6 across prior treatment characteristics, and 4 across patient baseline characteristics). Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and patient safety data were evaluated. Results Mortality and morbidity risk was lower on nal-IRI+5-FU/LV treatment across subgroups. Exceptions were patients who had received prior nonliposomal irinotecan and those who had undergone prior Whipple procedure (overall survival hazard ratio = 1.25 and 1.23, respectively). Decreased appetite, liver metastases, and number of measurable metastatic lesions seemed to be prognostic of survival in this population. Subgroup safety data were generally comparable with those in the overall NAPOLI-1 safety population. Conclusions A diverse population of patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy benefited from nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV, potentially helping guide treatment decisions for challenging cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据