4.1 Article

Functional phenotype variations of two novel KV7.1 mutations identified in patients with Long QT syndrome

期刊

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 210-216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pace.13870

关键词

cardiac electrophysiology; I-Ks current; risk stratification

资金

  1. Danmarks Grundforskningsfond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The slow delayed rectifier potassium current I-Ks is crucial for the repolarization of the cardiac action potential. It is conducted by the voltage-gated channel K(V)7.1 encoded by KCNQ1, together with its beta-subunit KCNE1. Loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in KCNQ1 have been associated with heritable cardiac arrhythmias such as Long QT syndrome (LQTS). This disease is characterized by prolonged ventricular repolarization and propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmia that may lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, and sudden death. We aimed to functionally characterize two K(V)7.1 mutations (p.A150T and p.L374H) identified in two independent LQTS patients with different severity of disease phenotype, family history, and co-segregation of LQTS. Methods We performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings in CHO-K1 cells, and confocal imaging in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells. Results I-Ks-A150T showed significantly decreased current amplitudes from above +20 mV (approximately 52% decrease at +40 mV), but demonstrated cell membrane localization similar to wild-type (WT). I-Ks-L374H, however, exhibited a complete LOF compared to WT channels. Confocal imaging showed endoplasmic reticulum retention of the channel in MDCK cells. Mimicking the heterozygous state of the patients by co-expressing WT and mutant subunits resulted in an approximately 22% decrease in current at +40 mV for A150T. The L374H mutation showed a more pronounced effect (62% reduction at +40 mV compared to WT channel). Conclusion Both mutations, K(V)7.1 A150T and L374H, led to loss of channel function. The degree of LOF may mirror the disease phenotype observed in the patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据