4.6 Article

The role of adjuvant (chemo-)radiotherapy in oral cancers in the contemporary era

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104563

关键词

Oral cavity; Squamous cell carcinoma; Margins of excision; IMRT; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Outcomes

资金

  1. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen Fund [SZSM201612024]
  2. Bartley-Smith/Wharton
  3. Wharton Head and Neck Translational
  4. Petersen-Turofsky Funds
  5. Joe & Cara Finley Center for Head & Neck Cancer Research
  6. Discovery Fund at the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (OSCC) is predominantly managed with surgery. Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) enhance disease control in OSCC patients with adverse anatomic and pathologic primary and nodal features. Knowledge about disease behavior, surgery and radiotherapy advances, and the emergence of new systemic agents prompt refinement of PORT volumes and POCRT regimens. Traditional and emerging prognostic models that include adverse histopathological features underpin such approaches. This review summarizes research over recent decades with emphasis on the 2015 to Feb 2019 period describing: (1) Indications for PORT and/or POCRT, addressing surgical margin status including the definition of a clear margin to permit withholding PORT/POCRT; these concepts include characterizing the specimen yielding these measurements, the optimal time point to assess these findings, and the putative value of a revised margin performed during the same operative procedure, (2) Emerging prognostic factors including nodal burden (total number of involved lymph nodes) and perineural invasion, (3) PORT volume design, dose/fractionation and optimal surgery-to-PORT interval, (4) Chemotherapy dose, schedule, and agents, and (5) On-going clinical trials involving systemic agents and combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据