4.6 Article

Salivary microbiota and inflammation-related proteins in patients with psoriasis

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 677-687

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13277

关键词

inflammation; microbiota; periodontitis; psoriasis; saliva

资金

  1. Danish Foundation for Mutual Efforts in Dental Care
  2. Independent Research Council Denmark
  3. Danish Dental Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The purpose of the present study was to characterize the composition of the salivary microbiota and quantify salivary levels of inflammation-related proteins (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL] and transferrin) in patients with psoriasis and compare data to those obtained in patients with periodontitis and orally healthy controls, respectively. Materials and methods Stimulated saliva samples from patients with psoriasis (n = 27), patients with periodontitis (n = 58), and orally healthy controls (n = 52) were characterized by means of next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Salivary levels of NGAL and transferrin were quantified using immunoassays. Results Linear discriminant effect size analysis showed that 52 (22 psoriasis-associated and 30 periodontitis-associated) and 21 (8 psoriasis-associated and 13 orally healthy control-associated) bacterial taxa differentiated the salivary microbiota in patients with psoriasis from that of patients with periodontitis and orally healthy controls, respectively. Significantly lower mean salivary levels of NGAL (psoriasis: 996 [std. error 320], periodontitis: 2,072 [295], orally healthy controls: 2,551 [345] ng/ml, p < .0001) and transferrin (psoriasis: 4.37 [0.92], periodontitis: 7.25 [0.88], orally healthy controls: 10.02 [0.94] ng/ml, p < .0001) were identified in patients with psoriasis. Conclusions Psoriasis associates with characteristics of the salivary microbiota and salivary levels of inflammation-related proteins, which are different from characteristics in patients with periodontitis and orally healthy controls, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据