4.7 Article

Superiority quantitation of laser-driving in Sm3+ doped germanium tellurite glass phosphors as bio-friendly lighting sources

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105685

关键词

Superiority quantitation; Laser-driving; Bio-friendly lighting sources; Sm(3+)ion; Germanium tellurite glasses

资金

  1. Support Program for Innovative Talents of Universities from Education Department of Liaoning Province, China [LR2016014]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [20170540068]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [11218018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intense multi-peak red fluorescence of Sm3+ has been quantitatively characterized and the superiority of laser pumping has been verified in heavy metal germanium tellurite (HGT) glasses. The dipole-dipole interaction between Sm3(+).Sm3+ ions is proved to be a dominant mechanism governing the non-radiative energy transfer. The net emission power and the net emission photon number in HGT-Sm-1.0 glass are increased by 393.61 mu W and 13.26 x 10(14) cps under the excitation of the 464 nm laser compared with those of the 470 nm LED pumping, and the corresponding quantum yield is as high as 17.55% which is 60% higher than that in the common LED. The environmental-friendly red emissions (590-780 nm) occupy a ratio of up to 83.3% in total released photon numbers, and the maximum luminous flux of Sm3+ reaches to 0.16 lm, exhibiting the availability of employed laser-driving approach. Moreover, the high-quality red light can be further optimized by narrow-band filter, which can intercept the residual laser fully compared with broad-band exciting sources. Efficient red fluorescence emissions and large absolute spectral parameters confirm the superiority of laser-driving on Sm(3+ )doped HGT glass phosphors for lighting source, which further promotes the development of bio-friendly illumination sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据