4.7 Article

Hybrid SW-NS SPH models using open boundary conditions for simulation of free-surface flows

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106845

关键词

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics; Hybrid model; Open boundary condition; Shallow water equation; Navier-Stokes equation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809238, 51779228]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20191306514]
  3. Scientific Research Program of Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics Estuary [A17001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Balancing the trade-off between the simulation detail and the computational efficiency in a hydrodynamic numerical model is generally difficult, e.g., one can hardly find a single set of governing equations that is capable of efficiently describing the wave propagation processes from offshore to nearshore and accurately presenting the details of wave breaking and interacting with coastal structures simultaneously. To address this predicament, open boundary coupling schemes are proposed in this paper to hybridize a SWE (shallow water equations)-based SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) model with a NS (Navier-Stokes) equations-based SPH model. The NS-SPH model is used to present the nonlinear hydrodynamic features in the main study domains, while the remaining domains are simulated with the SWE-SPH model, which calculates much faster than the NS-SPH model. The hybrid SPH models are applied to simulate solitary wave propagation, steady flows over a bump, dam breaking waves and standing waves. The hybridization performance on the information transmitting, mass and energy conservation, simulation detail, computational accuracy, computational efficiency and computational convergence speed is fully validated and evaluated. The results indicate that the proposed open boundary coupling schemes are capable of improving the computational efficiency on the premise of computational accuracy and simulation detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据