4.7 Article

A simulation-based actuator surface parameterization for large-eddy simulation of propeller wakes

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107023

关键词

Actuator surface; Simulation-based parameterization; Propeller; LES; RANS

资金

  1. NSFC Basic Science Center Program for 'Multiscale Problems in Nonlinear Mechanics' [11988102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572331, 91752118]
  3. National Numerical Wind Tunnel Project of China [NNW2018-ZT1A01]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB22040104]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSWSYS002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing actuator surface models for wind turbines, which are developed based on the blade element method using the two-dimensional assumption, cannot be easily applied to some marine propellers of highly three-dimensional geometry. In the present paper, a simulation-based actuator surface parameterization for large-eddy simulation (LES) of propeller wakes with the distributed forces computed using a precursor Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is proposed to address this issue. Three different actuator surface models, which apply the RANS computed forces directly on the blade surface and apply the RANS-computed forces with/without averaging in the chordwise direction on the 2-D elements of the thickless actuator surface, respectively, are tested. The mean velocity profiles at downstream locations of the propeller are found to be similar for the three different models. The turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) profiles computed from the three different models, on the other hand, are found to be very different in terms of the location and size of the high TKE region. This study indicates the importance of properly modeling the geometrical and hydrodynamic effects of blade in actuator surface models in order to accurately predict propeller wakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据