4.4 Article

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions and optimizing nitrogen-use efficiency in dryland crop rotations with different nitrogen rates

期刊

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 381-395

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-020-10046-0

关键词

Crop production; Dryland cropping systems; Emission factor; Management practices; Nitrogen rate; N2O flux

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent interests in improving agricultural production while minimizing environmental footprints emphasized the need for research on management strategies that reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and increase nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) of cropping systems. This study aimed to evaluate N2O emissions, annualized crop grain yield, emission factor, and yield-scaled- and NUE-scaled N2O emissions under continuous spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (CW) and spring wheat-pea (Pisum sativum L.) (WP) rotations with four N fertilization rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha(-1)). The N2O fluxes peaked immediately after N fertilization, intense precipitation, and snowmelt, which accounted for 75-85% of the total annual flux. Cumulative N2O flux usually increased with increased N fertilization rate in all crop rotations and years. Annualized crop yield and NUE were greater in WP than CW for 0 kg N ha(-1) in all years, but the trend reversed with 100 kg N ha(-1) in 2013 and 2015. Crop yield maximized at 100 kg N ha(-1), but NUE declined linearly with increased N fertilization rate in all crop rotations and years. As N fertilization rate increased, N fertilizer-scaled N2O flux decreased, but NUE-scaled N2O flux increased non-linearly in all years, regardless of crop rotations. The yield-scaled N2O flux decreased from 0 to 50 kg N ha(-1) and then increased with increased N fertilization rate. Because of non-significant difference of N2O fluxes between 50 and 100 kg N ha(-1), but increased crop yield, N2O emissions can be minimized while dryland crop yields and NUE can be optimized with 100 kg N ha(-1), regardless of crop rotations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据