4.8 Article

Quantitative global studies reveal differential translational control by start codon context across the fungal kingdom

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 2312-2331

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa060

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01AI120464, R01GM71801]
  2. Wellcome Trust [208779/Z/17/Z]
  3. Royal Society [208779/Z/17/Z]
  4. Wellcome University of Edinburgh ISSF3 award
  5. Infect-ERA grant (project Cryptoview)
  6. University of Edinburgh
  7. Wellcome Trust [208779/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eukaryotic protein synthesis generally initiates at a start codon defined by an AUG and its surrounding Kozak sequence context, but the quantitative importance of this context in different species is unclear. We tested this concept in two pathogenic Cryptococcus yeast species by genome-wide mapping of translation and of mRNA 5 and 3' ends. We observed thousands of AUG-initiated upstream open reading frames (uORFs) that are a major contributor to translation repression. uORF use depends on the Kozak sequence context of its start codon, and uORFs with strong contexts promote nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Transcript leaders in Cryptococcus and other fungi are substantially longer and more AUG-dense than in Saccharomyces. Numerous Cryptococcus mRNAs encode predicted dual-localized proteins, including many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, in which a leaky AUG start codon is followed by a strong Kozak context in-frame AUG, separated by mitochondrial-targeting sequence. Analysis of other fungal species shows that such dual-localization is also predicted to be common in the ascomycete mould, Neurospora crassa. Kozak-controlled regulation is correlated with insertions in translational initiation factors in fidelity-determining regions that contact the initiator tRNA. Thus, start codon context is is a signal that quantitatively programs both the expression and the structures of proteins in diverse fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据