4.8 Article

Molecular basis for t6A modification in human mitochondria

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 3181-3194

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa093

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0504000]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31670801, 31822015, 91940302, 31500644, 31570792, 81870896]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB19010203]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases [Shelab201904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-6-Threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t(6)A) is a universal tRNA modification essential for translational accuracy and fidelity. In human mitochondria, YrdC synthesises an L-threonylcarbamoyl adenylate (TC-AMP) intermediate, and OSGEPL1 transfers the TC-moiety to five tRNAs, including human mitochondrial tRNA(Thr) (hmtRNA(Thr)). Mutation of hmtRNAs, YrdC and OSGEPL1, affecting efficient t(6)A modification, has been implicated in various human diseases. However, little is known about the tRNA recognition mechanism in t(6)A formation in human mitochondria. Herein, we showed that OSGEPL1 is a monomer and is unique in utilising C34 as an anti-determinant by studying the contributions of individual bases in the anticodon loop of hmtRNA(Thr) to t(6)A modification. OSGEPL1 activity was greatly enhanced by introducing G38A in hmtRNA(lle) or the A28:U42 base pair in a chimeric tRNA containing the anticodon stem of hmtRNA(ser)(AGY), suggesting that sequences of specific hmtRNAs are fine-tuned for different modification levels. Moreover, using purified OSGEPL1, we identified multiple acetylation sites, and OSGEPL1 activity was readily affected by acetylation via multiple mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, we systematically elucidated the nucleotide requirement in the anticodon loop of hmtRNAs, and revealed mechanisms involving tRNA sequence optimisation and post-translational protein modification that determine t(6)A modification levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据