4.8 Article

RNA-Puzzles toolkit: a computational resource of RNA 3D structure benchmark datasets, structure manipulation, and evaluation tools

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 576-588

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [NCN] [2015/17/N/NZ2/03360, 2016/23/B/ST6/03931, 2016/23/N/ST6/03779, 2017/26/A/NZ 1/01083]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science - European Union under the European Regional Development Fund [MAB/20172]
  3. Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology [09/91/SBAD/0681]
  4. Single Cell Gene Expression Atlas grant from the Wellcome Trust [108437/Z/15/Z]
  5. Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant improvements have been made in the efficiency and accuracy of RNA 3D structure prediction methods during the succeeding challenges of RNA-Puzzles, a community-wide effort on the assessment of blind prediction of RNA tertiary structures. The RNA-Puzzles contest has shown, among others, that the development and validation of computational methods for RNA fold prediction strongly depend on the benchmark datasets and the structure comparison algorithms. Yet, there has been no systematic benchmark set or decoy structures available for the 3D structure prediction of RNA, hindering the standardization of comparative tests in the modeling of RNA structure. Furthermore, there has not been a unified set of tools that allows deep and complete RNA structure analysis, and at the same time, that is easy to use. Here, we present RNA-Puzzles toolkit, a computational resource including (i) decoy sets generated by different RNA 3D structure prediction methods (raw, for-evaluation and standardized datasets), (ii) 3D structure normalization, analysis, manipulation, visualization tools (RNA_format, RNA_normalizer, rna-tools) and (iii) 3D structure comparison metric tools (RNAQUA, MCQ4Structures). This resource provides a full list of computational tools as well as a standard RNA 3D structure prediction assessment protocol for the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据