4.4 Article

CLUES model calibration: residual analysis to investigate potential sources of model error

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2019.1697708

关键词

Overseer; SPARROW; SPASMO; total nitrogen; total phosphorus; E; coli; annual loads; uncertainty; bias; error

资金

  1. Sources and Flows Programme of the Our Land and Water National Science Challenge [Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment] [C10X1507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the latest calibrations of the CLUES model for total nitrogen, total phosphorus and Escherichia coli in New Zealand rivers. The model provides reasonable load estimates at the catchment scale, but there is significant uncertainty in the parameterisation and no systematic bias was found in the calibration.
This paper presents the results of the latest calibrations of the CLUES model for each of total nitrogen, total phosphorus and Escherichia coli. The model provides estimates of in-stream annual loads of these contaminants for every river reach in the New Zealand River Environments Classification and has been used in New Zealand for catchment planning and policy development. CLUES has been calibrated nationally against loads estimated from data collected from water quality monitoring stations located across the country which could lead to parameter bias. To ascertain whether there is any systematic bias, the calibration residuals were evaluated against regional (geographical) location and a range of upstream catchment characteristics, namely land use, soil drainage properties, slope, network order, proportion of baseflow in total stream flow, climate, geology and source of flow. We found that CLUES gives reasonable load estimates at the catchment scale (Nash-Sutcliff efficiencies >0.8 for all the contaminants). However, there was significant uncertainty in the parameterisation. While several significant relationships were found between upstream catchment characteristics and the model residuals, these relationships were weak and are unlikely to point to any systematic bias in the calibration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据