4.6 Review

Chromosome restructuring among hybridizing wild wheats

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 226, 期 5, 页码 1263-1273

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16415

关键词

Aegilops-Triticum (wild wheats); chromosome evolution; genome dynamics; hybrid speciation; repeated sequences; transposable elements

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-153388]
  2. Russian State Foundation for Basic Research [17-04-00087]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_153388] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wheat group offers an outstanding system to address the interplay between hybridization, chromosomal evolution and biological diversification. Most diploid wild wheats originated following hybridization between the A-genome lineage and the B-genome lineage some 4 Myr ago, resulting in an admixed D-genome lineage that presented dramatic radiation accompanied by considerable changes in genome size and chromosomal rearrangements. Comparative profiling of low-copy genes, repeated sequences and transposable elements among those divergent species characterized by different karyotypes highlights high genome dynamics and sheds new light on the processes underlying chromosomal evolution in wild wheats. One of the hybrid clades presents upsizing of metacentric chromosomes going along with the proliferation of specific repeats (i.e. 'genomic obesity'), whereas other species show stable genome size associated with increasing chromosomal asymmetry. Genetic and ecological variation in those specialized species suggest that genome restructuring was coupled with adaptive processes to support the evolution of a majority of acrocentric chromosomes. This synthesis of current knowledge on genome restructuring across the diversity of wild wheats paves the way towards surveys based on latest sequencing technologies to characterize valuable resources and address the significance of chromosomal evolution in species with complex genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据