4.6 Article

Lateral roots, in addition to adventitious roots, form a barrier to radial oxygen loss in Zea nicaraguensis and a chromosome segment introgression line in maize

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 229, 期 1, 页码 94-105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16452

关键词

aerenchyma; crop wild relative; hypoxia; maize (Zea mays ssp; mays); ROL; root internal aeration; root respiration; soil waterlogging or flooding

资金

  1. Independent Research Fund Denmark [8021-00120B]
  2. Carlsberg Foundation [CV17-0067]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [18H02175]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H02175] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that lateral roots can form a barrier to radial O-2 loss, limiting the loss of oxygen, which may reduce the role of root systems in oxygen loss for some plant species.
Plants typically respond to waterlogging by producing new adventitious roots with aerenchyma and many wetland plants form a root barrier to radial O-2 loss (ROL), but it was not known if this was also the case for lateral roots. We tested the hypothesis that lateral roots arising from adventitious roots can form a ROL barrier, using root-sleeving electrodes and O-2 microsensors to assess ROL of Zea nicaraguensis, the maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) introgression line with a locus for ROL barrier formation (introgression line (IL) #468) from Z. nicaraguensis and a maize inbred line (Mi29). Lateral roots of Z. nicaraguensis and IL #468 both formed a ROL barrier under stagnant, deoxygenated conditions, whereas Mi29 did not. Lateral roots of Z. nicaraguensis had higher tissue O-2 status than for IL #468 and Mi29. The ROL barrier was visible as suberin in the root hypodermis/exodermis. Modelling showed that laterals roots can grow to a maximum length of 74 mm with a ROL barrier, but only to 33 mm without a barrier. Presence of a ROL barrier in lateral roots requires reconsideration of the role of these roots as sites of O-2 loss, which for some species now appears to be less than hitherto thought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据