4.6 Review

The Efficacy and Safety of Iron Supplementation in Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 151-159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and has been associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations. However, the benefit and safety of iron supplementation in treating HF and ID in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are inconclusive. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to overcome this limitation. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for eligible trials up to December 31, 2014. We also searched the references of all relevant studies and reviews for more trials. Only RCTs reporting the clinical impact of iron therapy in patients with HF with ID compared with no iron treatment were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Results: Five clinical trials comprising a total of 907 patients were finally included. Compared with placebo or no treatment, additional iron therapy was associated with a significantly reduced rate of hospitalization for HF (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.49), though all-cause mortality was not significantly different (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.57). In 4 studies where these endpoints were combined, the incidence of hospitalization for HF and death was lowered in the iron supplementation group (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.76). There was no increase in the risk of adverse events. Conclusions: Iron supplementation significantly reduced the risk of (a) hospitalization for HF and (b) the combined endpoint of hospitalization for HF and death, without increasing the risk of adverse events in patients with symptomatic systolic HF and ID. However, the current data are inadequate to make a clear determination upon mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据