4.5 Article

The safety and effectiveness of chenodeoxycholic acid treatment in patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis: two retrospective cohort studies

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 943-949

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-04169-8

关键词

Chenodeoxycholic acid; Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis; Metabolic disorders; Italy; The Netherlands

资金

  1. Leadiant Biosciences Ltd (UK)
  2. Leadiant Biosciences Ltd (UK) [CDCA-STUK-15-001, CDCA-STRCH-CR-14-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) treatment in patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX). Methods Two retrospective cohort studies were conducted in CTX patients who underwent CDCA treatment: one in the Netherlands (NL; CDCA-STUK-15-001) and one in Italy (IT; CDCA-STRCH-CR-14-001). Eligible patients were aged 2-75 years, had been diagnosed with CTX, and were treated with CDCA orally for >= 1 year. The impact of CDCA treatment on biochemical markers (including serum cholestanol levels) and disease signs and symptoms were assessed, in addition to the safety and tolerability of CDCA treatment. Results A total of 35 patients were screened in the NL study and were diagnosed with CTX at 25.6 (+/- 13.7 SD) years on average. These patients were treated with CDCA and followed up for a median of 9.00 (range: 0.4-26.3) years. In addition, 28 patients were enrolled in the IT study and were diagnosed at 35.0 (+/- 11.4 SD) years on average (median duration of CDCA treatment: 5.75 [range: 0.0-25.0] years). Signs and symptoms of disease resolved, improved, or remained stable in many patients, with concomitant improvements in biochemical marker levels (serum cholestanol, p < 0.001; 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, p < 0.001 [IT study]). Conclusions The outcomes of these retrospective cohort studies indicate that CDCA is effective in the long-term treatment of CTX, with an acceptable safety profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据