4.5 Article

Complex roles for reactive astrocytes in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 135-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.02.010

关键词

Reactive astrocytes; Alzheimer disease; Tau; JAK-STAT3 pathway; SOCS3; Neuroinflammation

资金

  1. CEA, CNRS
  2. French National Research Agency [2010JCJC-1402-1, 2011-BSV4-021-03, ANR-16-TERC-0016-01, 2011-INBS-0011 NeurATRIS]
  3. Fondation Vaincre Alzheimer [FR-15015]
  4. Association France Alzheimer
  5. Fondation de France
  6. Federation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau
  7. CEA
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-TERC-0016] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Alzheimer disease (AD), astrocytes undergo complex changes and become reactive. The consequences of this reaction are still unclear. To evaluate the net impact of reactive astrocytes in AD, we developed viral vectors targeting astrocytes that either activate or inhibit the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK2-STAT3) pathway, a central cascade controlling astrocyte reaction. We aimed to evaluate whether reactive astrocytes contribute to tau as well as amyloid pathologies in the hippocampus of 3xTg-AD mice, an AD model that develops tau hyper-phosphorylation and amyloid deposition. JAK2-STAT3 pathway-mediated modulation of reactive astrocytes in 25% of the hippocampus of 3xTg-AD mice did not significantly influence tau phosphorylation or amyloid processing and deposition at early, advanced, and terminal disease stage. Interestingly, inhibition of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway in hippocampal astrocytes did not improve spatial memory in the Y maze but it did reduce anxiety in the elevated plus maze. Our unique approach to specifically manipulate reactive astrocytes in situ show they may impact behavioral outcomes without influencing tau or amyloid pathology. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据