4.6 Article

Multimodal feature fusion for CNN-based gait recognition: an empirical comparison

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 32, 期 17, 页码 14173-14193

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-04811-z

关键词

Gait signature; Convolutional neural networks; Multimodal fusion

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia [TIC-1692]
  2. NVIDIA Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People identification in video based on the way they walk (i.e., gait) is a relevant task in computer vision using a noninvasive approach. Standard and current approaches typically derive gait signatures from sequences of binary energy maps of subjects extracted from images, but this process introduces a large amount of non-stationary noise, thus conditioning their efficacy. In contrast, in this paper we focus on the raw pixels, or simple functions derived from them, letting advanced learning techniques to extract relevant features. Therefore, we present a comparative study of different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures by using three different modalities (i.e., gray pixels, optical flow channels and depth maps) on two widely adopted and challenging datasets: TUM-GAID and CASIA-B. In addition, we perform a comparative study between different early and late fusion methods used to combine the information obtained from each kind of modalities. Our experimental results suggest that (1) the raw pixel values represent a competitive input modality, compared to the traditional state-of-the-art silhouette-based features (e.g., GEI), since equivalent or better results are obtained; (2) the fusion of the raw pixel information with information from optical flow and depth maps allows to obtain state-of-the-art results on the gait recognition task with an image resolution several times smaller than the previously reported results; and (3) the selection and the design of the CNN architecture are critical points that can make a difference between state-of-the-art results or poor ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据