4.6 Article

Opportunistic infections after conversion to belatacept in kidney transplantation

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 336-345

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz255

关键词

belatacept; infection; kidney transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Belatacept (bela) rescue therapy seems to be a valuable option for calcineurin inhibitor chronic toxicity in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, the risk of infection associated with bela is not well reported. Methods We report the rate of opportunistic infections (OPI) after a switch to bela in a multicentric cohort of 280 kidney transplant patients. Results Forty-two OPI occurred in 34 patients (12.1%), on average 10.811.3months after the switch. With a cumulative exposure of 5128months of bela treatment, we found an incidence of 0.008 OPI/month of exposure, and 9.8 OPI/100 person-years. The most common OPI was cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in 18/42 OPI (42.9%) and pneumocystis pneumonia in 12/42 OPI (28.6%). Two patients presented a progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and two patients developed a cerebral Epstein-Barr virus-induced post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. OPI led to death in 9/34 patients (26.5%) and graft failure in 4/34 patients (11.8%). In multivariate analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate<25/mL/min/1.73m(2) on the day of the switch and the use of immunosuppressive agents before transplantation were associated with the occurrence of OPI. We found a higher rate of infection-related hospitalization (24.1 versus 12.3/100 person-years, P=0.0007) and also a higher rate of OPI (13.2 versus 6.7/100 person-years, P=0.005) in the early conversion group (within 6months). Conclusions The risk of OPI is significant post-conversion to bela and may require additional monitoring and prophylactic therapy, particularly regarding pneumocystis pneumonia and CMV disease. These data need to be confirmed in a larger case-control study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据