4.7 Review

Next-generation physiology approaches to study microbiome function at single cell level

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 241-256

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41579-020-0323-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5999]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-1726561, 1817428, 1736255]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NSSC19K0449]
  4. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust [SR-2017331]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1817428] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The function of cells in their native habitat often cannot be reliably predicted from genomic data or from physiology studies of isolates. Traditional experimental approaches to study the function of taxonomically and metabolically diverse microbiomes are limited by their destructive nature, low spatial resolution or low throughput. Recently developed technologies can offer new insights into cellular function in natural and human-made systems and how microorganisms interact with and shape the environments that they inhabit. In this Review, we provide an overview of these next-generation physiology approaches and discuss how the non-destructive analysis of cellular phenotypes, in combination with the separation of the target cells for downstream analyses, provide powerful new, complementary ways to study microbiome function. We anticipate that the widespread application of next-generation physiology approaches will transform the field of microbial ecology and dramatically improve our understanding of how microorganisms function in their native environment. In this Review, Hatzenpichler et al. introduce next-generation physiology, which is a suite of new techniques that enable investigation into the phenotypes of individual cells in a non-destructive manner. Next-generation physiology complements genomics and culturing and provides new insights into microbiome function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据