4.7 Article

Manipulating gene translation in plants by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing of upstream open reading frames

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 338-363

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0238-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Transgenic Science and Technology Program [2018ZX0801002B, 2019ZX08010001, 2018ZX0800102B, 2019ZX08010-003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31788103, 31971370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression is regulated by multiple processes, and the translation of mRNAs into proteins is an especially critical step. Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are widespread cis-elements in eukaryotic genes that usually suppress the translation of downstream primary ORFs (pORFs). Here, we describe a protocol for fine-tuning gene translation in plants by editing endogenous uORFs with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. The method we present readily yields transgene-free uorf mutant offspring. We provide detailed protocols for predicting uORFs and testing their effects on downstream pORFs using a dual-luciferase reporter system, designing and constructing single guide RNA (sgRNA)-Cas9 vectors, identifying transgene-free uorf mutants, and finally comparing the mRNA, protein and phenotypic levels of target genes in uorf mutants and controls. Predicting uORFs and confirming their effects in protoplasts takes only 2-3 weeks, and transgene-free mutants with edited target uORFs controlling different levels of pORF translation can be obtained within 4 months. Unlike previous methods, our strategy achieves fine-tuning of gene translation in transgene-free derivatives, which accelerates the analysis of gene function and the improvement of crop traits. In this protocol, the authors describe a method to fine-tune gene expression in plants by editing endogenous upstream ORFs with the CRISPR-Cas9 system to prevent their inhibition of the translation of primary ORFs. This protocol yields transgene-free uorf mutant offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据