4.8 Article

Sub-femtosecond electron transport in a nanoscale gap

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 341-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0745-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Emmy Noether programme and the collaborative research centre [BR 5030/1-1, SFB 767]
  2. European Research Council [819871]
  3. Departmento de Educacion, Politica Linguistica y Cultura of the Basque Government [PI2017-30]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities MICINN [FIS2016-80174-P]
  5. Basque Government [IT1164-19]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [819871] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-cycle interferometric autocorrelation measurements of electrons tunnelling across the gap of a plasmonic bowtie antenna and quantitative models provide insight into the physical interactions that drive the electron transfer. The strong fields associated with few-cycle pulses can drive highly nonlinear phenomena, allowing the direct control of electrons in condensed matter systems. In this context, by employing near-infrared single-cycle pulse pairs, we measure interferometric autocorrelations of the ultrafast currents induced by optical field emission at the nanogap of a single plasmonic nanocircuit. The dynamics of this ultrafast electron nanotransport depends on the precise temporal field profile of the optical driving pulse. Current autocorrelations are acquired with sub-femtosecond temporal resolution as a function of both pulse delay and absolute carrier-envelope phase. Quantitative modelling of the experiments enables us to monitor the spatiotemporal evolution of the electron density and currents induced in the system and to elucidate the physics underlying the electron transfer driven by strong optical fields in plasmonic gaps. Specifically, we clarify the interplay between the carrier-envelope phase of the driving pulse, plasmonic resonance and quiver motion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据