4.8 Article

Deeply virtual Compton scattering off the neutron

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 191-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0774-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  5. Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives
  6. P2IO Laboratory of Excellence
  7. US DOE [DE-AC05060R23177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional structure of nucleons (protons and neutrons) is embedded in so-called generalized parton distributions, which are accessible from deeply virtual Compton scattering. In this process, a high-energy electron is scattered off a nucleon by exchanging a virtual photon. Then, a highly energetic real photon is emitted from one of the quarks inside the nucleon, which carries information on the quark's transverse position and longitudinal momentum. By measuring the cross-section of deeply virtual Compton scattering, Compton form factors related to the generalized parton distributions can be extracted. Here, we report the observation of unpolarized deeply virtual Compton scattering off a deuterium target. From the measured photon-electroproduction cross-sections, we have extracted the cross-section of a quasifree neutron and a coherent deuteron. Due to the approximate isospin symmetry of quantum chromodynamics, we can determine the contributions from the different quark flavours to the helicity-conserved Compton form factors by combining our measurements with previous ones probing the proton's internal structure. These results advance our understanding of the description of the nucleon structure, which is important to solve the proton spin puzzle. The internal structure of the neutron has now been probed by highly energetic photons scattering off it. Combined with previous results for protons, these measurements reveal the contributions of quark flavours to the nucleon structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据