4.7 Article

Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 176-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0574-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program at the NIDA
  2. Canada Research Chair's program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Undergraduate Student Research Award
  5. Concordia University Undergraduate Research Award
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [ZIADA000587] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maes et al. use second-order conditioning, blocking and optogenetic inhibition to show that cue-evoked dopamine transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions. Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well established as prediction errors. However, the central tenet of temporal difference accounts-that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors-remains untested. In the present communication we addressed this by showing that optogenetically shunting dopamine activity at the start of a reward-predicting cue prevents second-order conditioning without affecting blocking. These results indicate that cue-evoked transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据